NABL ACCREDITED · ISO/IEC 17025:2017

6 Ways We Prove Your Implant Outlasts a Lifetime of Load

Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing for hip, knee, spinal, and dental implants at our Oragadam laboratory — fixation strength, cyclic fatigue, static strength, corrosion, and wear debris evaluation referenced to ISO 14242 and ISO 14243.

Call 90876 86986 WhatsApp Us

An implant that passes a single static load test can still fail years later, worn down by millions of quiet cycles of walking, bending, and bearing weight inside the body.

This is the checkpoint that catches exactly that slow-motion failure before a device ever reaches a patient, by compressing years of joint motion, cyclic loading, and bodily-fluid exposure into a controlled laboratory programme. Our Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing programme at the Oragadam laboratory covers six checkpoints across fixation, motion, load, and corrosion, referenced to ISO 14242 and ISO 14243 for hip and knee wear simulation, ISO 7206 for hip stem fatigue and static strength, and ASTM F1875, F1877, and F543 for corrosion, wear debris, and fixation testing.

Fixation strength testing measures the pull-out and torque-out force of the screws, pins, and anchors that hold an implant in place, confirming the device won’t loosen under the repeated micro-movements of daily activity. Hip and knee implant wear testing for medical device components runs the articulating surfaces through millions of gait cycles inside a fluid bath that mimics synovial fluid, reproducing the exact sliding and rotational motion of a real joint over years of use — a test no static bench check could substitute for. Cyclic fatigue testing extends that same repeated-loading logic to spinal constructs, dental implants, and other load-bearing components, running each device through a defined number of load cycles to confirm it survives the full expected service life without cracking or loosening.

Static strength testing applies a single maximum load to confirm the implant construct doesn’t fail catastrophically under a worst-case stress event, while corrosion and fretting testing exposes metal-on-metal or modular junctions to simulated body fluid under cyclic micro-motion, since fretting corrosion at these interfaces is a well-documented failure mode in modular hip and spinal systems. Wear debris analysis for medical device implants examines the microscopic particles generated during wear simulation under SEM, because particle size, shape, and material composition directly influence the biological response the body has to years of accumulated debris. Manufacturers bring their programmes to Kiyo R&D Lab because a single missed checkpoint in Medical Device Testing doesn’t surface as a bench-test footnote — it surfaces as a loosened implant, a revision surgery, or a device recalled years after it was cleared. Running all six checkpoints under one accredited scope at Oragadam, with reports formatted for direct regulatory submission, is what turns implant durability testing into evidence your quality team can actually stand behind.

ORTHOPAEDIC & IMPLANT EVALUATION

Six Accredited Implant Wear & Fatigue Checkpoints

Part of our Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing panel, referenced to ISO 14242 and ISO 14243

Fixation strength pull-out test fixture for medical device implant screw
01

Fixation Strength Test

ASTM F543

Hip and knee implant wear testing simulator with fluid bath for medical device
02

Hip & Knee Implant Wear Test

ISO 14242 / ISO 14243

Cyclic fatigue testing rig on dental implant crown for medical device
03

Cyclic Fatigue Test

ISO 7206-4

Static strength testing spinal rod construct for medical device implant
04

Static Strength Test

ASTM F1717

Corrosion and fretting test on hip implant stem for medical device
05

Corrosion & Fretting Test

ASTM F1875

Wear debris analysis SEM micrographs of implant particles for medical device
06

Wear Debris Analysis

ASTM F1877

How Our Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing Process Works

Four steps, from sample intake to a validated report

1

Sample Intake

Implant received against your target ISO 14242, ISO 14243, or ISO 7206 sub-clause.

2

Fixation & Static Load

Pull-out force and worst-case static strength measured before cyclic testing.

3

Wear & Fatigue Cycling

Millions of gait and load cycles run in a fluid bath simulating years of use.

4

Certified Report

Wear debris analysis and clause-mapped report delivered, ready for your file.

Standards Behind Our Medical Device Testing

CHECKPOINT SCOPE STANDARD
Hip and knee implant wear testing for medical deviceMillions of simulated gait cycles in fluid bathISO 14242 / ISO 14243
ISO 14242 and ISO 14243 testing for medical deviceHip & knee articulating-surface wear simulationISO 14242 / ISO 14243
Cyclic & Static Strength TestFatigue life and worst-case load capacityISO 7206-4
Wear debris analysis for medical deviceSEM characterization of wear particle size & shapeASTM F1877
VISIT OUR LABORATORY

Kiyo R&D Lab – Oragadam

Our implant durability testing suite is based at No.13, Srinivasa Perumal Street, Panapakkam, Serapanacheri, Greater Chennai, Tamil Nadu 601301.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing cover? +

It covers six checkpoints — fixation strength, hip and knee wear simulation, cyclic fatigue, static strength, corrosion and fretting, and wear debris analysis — referenced to ISO 14242, ISO 14243, ISO 7206, and related ASTM methods.

Why does hip and knee implant wear testing for medical device components run for millions of cycles? +

A joint implant experiences roughly a million loading cycles a year in an active patient, so a short test run would never reveal the gradual surface wear that only becomes measurable after a simulated multi-year duration.

What’s the difference between ISO 14242 and ISO 14243 testing for medical device implants? +

ISO 14242 governs hip joint wear simulation while ISO 14243 governs knee joint wear simulation, since the two joints move through different motion paths and load profiles that require distinct simulator setups and test protocols.

Why does this checkpoint matter beyond the wear volume number? +

Particle size, shape, and material composition directly influence how the body’s tissue responds to accumulated wear debris over years, so this checkpoint characterizes the particles under SEM rather than just measuring total material loss.

How do I get a quote for this testing? +

Call us at 90876 86986, message us on WhatsApp, or fill in the enquiry form below with your device and testing needs.

Book Your Implant Wear and Fatigue Testing Today

Talk to our Oragadam team about hip and knee wear simulation, wear debris analysis, or a full implant durability study for your medical device testing programme.

Call 90876 86986 WhatsApp Us

Request Implant Durability Testing

Fill in your details below and our team will get back to you shortly.

May i Help You!
Scroll to Top